Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness.
More On Article
- 2023 CALL FOR NOMINATIONS - The Rohlf Medal
- HEAS Head Gerhard Weber's article on 'The microstructure and the origin of the Venus from Willendorf' is in the Top 100 Scientific Reports papers published in 2022.
- New HEAS Bell Beaker workshop at the Natural History Museum on the 21st March
- Seascapes project announced in the European Archaeologist's Newsletter
- HEAS Head Gerhard Weber announces the release of the EVAN Toolbox 1.75 software for 3D shape and form analysis for free use.
Mitteroecker, P., Schaefer, K., Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness. American Journal of Biological Anthropology n/a.
The foundations of geometric morphometrics were worked out about 30 years ago and have continually been refined and extended. What has remained as a central thrust and source of debate in the morphometrics community is the shared goal of meaningful biological inference through a tight connection between biological theory, measurement, multivariate biostatistics, and geometry. Here we review the building blocks of modern geometric morphometrics: the representation of organismal geometry by landmarks and semilandmarks, the computation of shape or form variables via superimposition, the visualization of statistical results as actual shapes or forms, the decomposition of shape variation into symmetric and asymmetric components and into different spatial scales, the interpretation of various geometries in shape or form space, and models of the association between shape or form and other variables, such as environmental, genetic, or behavioral data. We focus on recent developments and current methodological challenges, especially those arising from the increasing number of landmarks and semilandmarks, and emphasize the importance of thorough exploratory multivariate analyses rather than single scalar summary statistics. We outline promising directions for further research and for the evaluation of new developments, such as “landmark-free” approaches. To illustrate these methods, we analyze three-dimensional human face shape based on data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).